Preemptive Kidney Transplantation
نویسنده
چکیده
End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is a severe health problem with high mortality and morbidity rates and growing incidence worldwide. Recently, two main renal replacement therapy modalities have been used for ESRD patients: Dialysis and kidney transplantation. It is undoubtedly clear that transplantation is the best choise for long term survival and every transplantation candidate is also a preemptive transplantation candidate. Preemptive kidney transplantation(PKT) may be summarized as transplantation before the commencement of dialysis in ESRD patients. Preemptive transplantation confers a significant benefit in terms of both patient and allograft survival. The benefit thought to be the result of avoidence of cardiovascular adverse effects of long term dialysis. Current opinion allows ESRD patients to receive PKT when their GFR is 20 mL per minute or less and preparation for transplantation should be started at the time of the diagnosing chronic renal disease. Kidney transplantation should be the choise of therapy in ESRD patients not only because of improving graft and patient survival and also preventing dialysis related comorbidities and lower cost in the long term(1,2,3). New and more effective immunsupressive drugs, growing experience in transplantation surgery are making kidney transplantation a more common and safe option. Although there are studies showing nephrologists have the same opinion that preemptive transplantation is the best treatment modality for eligible ESRD patients, that has been convincingly shown to improve posttransplant graft and patient survival. Unfortunately, while PKT is much more beneficial over transplantation, preemptive kidney transplantation seems to be underutilized specially as a result of late referral of the patients to a nephrologist and transplantation center. Only 2% of ESRD patients receive PKT while one forth of transplantation procedures are preemptive in children in the USA. Of course, there are other difficulties for PKT such as poor health status, lack of compliance, comorbidities, older patients, longer waiting time for deceased kidney donors and lack of social insurance. Ideally, preparation for transplantation should be initiated as soon as progressive chronic kidney disease (CKD) is recognized because cardiovascular morbidity and mortality rates increases while CKD progresses. Early referral to a nephrologist has a vital importance in this situation. Unfortunately, just about 50% of CKD patients come upon a nephrologist in end stage of chronic renal disease. Early referral not only allows careful preparation for PKT and also evaluation of potential living donor candidates and selecting the exact time for transplantation. Because the course of CKD varies according to the primary disease, earliest referral is synonymous to early preparation and beter outcome for transplantation.
منابع مشابه
Preemptive kidney transplantation in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Preemptive kidney transplantation is associated with superior outcomes. Patients who have kidney failure due to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) may not receive a preemptive kidney transplant because of the concern for risk of disease recurrence with shortened graft and patient survival. We identified 8001 patients in the United Network for Organ Sharing dataset who underwent kidney transplan...
متن کاملPreemptive kidney transplantation in patients with diabetes mellitus.
Kidney transplantation is the most preferred treatment for end-stage renal disease because it improves not only the patient's survival compared with dialysis, but also the quality of life. Preemptive transplantation is transplantation performed prior to the initiation of renal dialysis. Recent observational studies have shown increased patient and graft survival with preemptive transplantation,...
متن کاملPreemptive kidney transplantation: an ethical challenge for organ allocation policies.
Preemptive transplants are advisable in advanced stages of kidney disease. The clinical advantages of preemptive transplantation over dialysis are evident. Nevertheless, preemptive transplantations raise ethical concerns, particularly regarding the allocation of medical resources. The present article proposes some criteria for organ allocation policies regarding preemptive transplantations: cri...
متن کاملEarlier is not necessarily better in preemptive kidney transplantation.
While preemptive (before chronic dialysis) transplantation is associated with improved graft survival, it is unclear whether higher versus lower pretransplant kidney function is associated with even better graft survival after preemptive transplantation. We examined 671 first, preemptive, kidney-only transplantations at Hennepin County Medical Center and the University of Minnesota Medical Cent...
متن کاملRisks and benefits of preemptive second kidney transplantation.
BACKGROUND Information to guide the timing of a second kidney transplantation is limited. METHODS We compared outcomes of 3509 preemptive and 14,075 nonpreemptive second kidney transplant recipients in the U.S. Renal Data System between 1995 and 2007. RESULTS Preemptive recipients had less acute rejection (12% vs. 16%; P<0.0001) and delayed graft function (8% vs. 23%; P<0.0001). Preemptive ...
متن کاملPreemptive kidney transplantation: ethical issues.
Preemptive kidney transplantation, as a treatment modality for end-stage renal disease, offers higher clinical advantages compared to maintenance dialysis. Nevertheless, preemptive transplantations raises ethical concerns, particularly regarding medical resource allocation. From an ethical perspective, health care decisions should be focused on the patient's needs. Nevertheless, a fair distribu...
متن کامل